The catalog helps identify a starting point
The project questions do not promise a predetermined answer. They precisely define a shared challenge that requires knowledge distributed across different parts of the organization.
A collection of focused projects designed to help organizations detect threats early, prepare for different scenarios, reduce vulnerabilities and act coherently during disruptions. Each project concentrates collective knowledge on one resilience question—from early signals to recovery and systemic learning.
Project task: Contribute ideas on changes observed in operations and the external environment that could develop into material risks but are not yet monitored systematically.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute examples of frequent small failures, their possible connections and a possible common underlying cause that could lead to a larger disruption.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on where risk signals noticed by employees, customers or partners become stuck, are discounted or arrive too late.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on internal and external groups with different perspectives on risk and ways to incorporate their knowledge into risk assessment.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on clear qualitative and quantitative indicators that should initiate a broader review of the situation.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute scenarios in which one or more assumptions critical to the organization would change, and identify the potential consequences.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute compound scenarios that reveal possible interactions among operational, technological, financial, reputational or other risks.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on decisions, plans or investments whose success depends too heavily on a single untested or unstable assumption.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the downstream effects that urgent decisions could have on people, customers, partners, reputation or long-term capabilities.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on actions that would create value or reduce vulnerability regardless of which scenario ultimately unfolds.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on single points of dependency whose loss would stop or materially weaken an important organizational activity.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on tightly connected processes, systems or teams where a failure in one part could quickly affect the others.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on data, expertise, access and physical resources whose unavailability would impair decision-making or business continuity.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on supply-chain, infrastructure, regulatory, partner or other external relationships whose disruption is not adequately understood.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute examples where rules or controls formally exist but are bypassed, difficult to apply or ineffective against the risks encountered in daily work.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on changes to working habits, responsibilities, information flows or existing measures that could reduce risk without major investment.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on controls, plans or indicators that appear reliable but may prove inadequate or fail under real conditions.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on decision rights, roles and handoff boundaries whose ambiguity could delay action or increase harm during a crisis.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on reserves of people, capabilities, data, technology, financing or supply that are essential to the continuity of critical activities.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute and support preparedness actions that should be prioritized based on expected impact, feasibility and required resources.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the information needed during the first hours of a crisis, the criteria for judging its reliability and the fastest credible sources.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on recurring or time-critical decisions for which prior authorization would enable faster and clearer action.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on rapidly gathering essential insights from people closest to the situation and incorporating them into decision-making.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on criteria and decision-making principles for balancing people's safety, business continuity, customer needs, financial considerations and reputation.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on principles for transparent communication with employees, customers and partners when information is incomplete, changing or contradictory.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on the sequence for restoring activities, services, relationships and capabilities, along with criteria for setting priorities.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on indicators and evidence showing whether the organization has merely addressed visible consequences or has restored resilient operations.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on safe ways to surface weaknesses in decisions, coordination and systems while maintaining accountability for necessary change.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on temporary ways of working, partnerships or solutions that proved effective and could strengthen the organization under normal conditions.
Discuss this project →Project task: Contribute ideas on turning identified lessons into a portfolio of priority changes, assigning accountability and monitoring their long-term impact.
Discuss this project →The project questions do not promise a predetermined answer. They precisely define a shared challenge that requires knowledge distributed across different parts of the organization.
The practical minimum for one problem area is eight participants with relevant knowledge. The method is most reliable with 15–20 or more people whose experience and expertise complement one another.
In a short conversation, we can assess the situation, identify the right participant group, and determine how the project fits into a broader decision-making sequence.